|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
| Smugglers
and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture
of Property) Act, 1976-Commentary. |
|
|
|
| |
How does a competent
authority come to know of illegally acquired properties
of the detenues/ convicts held in their name or
in the name of their relatives/associates etc.?
The answer is provided in Sections 15,16,17, &18
of the SAFEM (FOP) Act, 1976. Section 16 gives
power to the Competent Authorities to require
any officer or authority of the Central Government,
State Government or a local authority to furnish
information in relation to such persons, points
or matters, which in the opinion of the Competent Authority
will be relevant to or useful for the purposes
of this Act. The officers of the Income-tax, Customs
& Central Excise Departments or any officer
of the enforcement agencies appointed under the
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, are duty
bound to furnish relevant information suo-moto
to the Competent Authority. Section 17 lays down
that officers of Customs, Central Excise, Income-tax
Department, Enforcement Directorate, Police and
such other officers of the Central or State Government
as may be notified in the official Gazette are
empowered and required to assist the Competent
Authority and the Appellate Tribunal. Section
18 gives power to the Competent Authority to get any enquiry
or investigation or survey done, by the income-tax
authorities.
|
Section 15 gives
power of the Civil Court to the Competent Authority
and the Appellate Tribunal in matters of summoning
and enforcing the attendance of any person and
examining him on oath, requiring the discovery
and production of documents, receiving evidence
on affidavits, requisitioning any public record
or copy thereof from any court or office, issuing
commissions for examinations of witnesses or documents
and any other matter, which may be prescribed.
Thus, the Competent Authority and the Appellate
Tribunal in these matters have all the powers
of a Civil Court while trying a suit under the
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
|
The Competent Authority
is not bound to accept the findings of the officers
of the other department like Police, Customs and
Income-Tax. Section 21 of the Act clearly provides
that no finding of any officer or authority under
any other law shall be conclusive for the purposes
of any proceedings under this Act. Section 22
deals with mode of service of notice and orders.
This shall be served by the registered post to
the person or his agent or in case, that is not
possible, the notice or order can be served by
affixture.
|
Section 19 of the
SAFEM (FOP) Act gives power to the Competent Authority
to take possession of the property forfeited to
the Central Government or of the property in respect
of which fine has not been paid under section
9 within the time allowed. As a matter of practice,
the District Magistrate is asked to take the possession
of the forfeited property, which is subsequently
sold by public auction arranged by the Income-Tax
Department.
|
| If
a person is aggrieved by the order of the Competent
Authority, he can file an appeal within 45 days
of the receipt of the order to the Appellate Tribunal
for Forfeited property, Lok Nayak Bhawan, 4th
Floor, Khan Market, New Delhi. No authority other
than the ATFP has the power to entertain any appeal
against the order to of the Competent Authority.
It has been clearly provided in section 14 of
the Act that no order passed or declaration made
under this Act shall be appealable except as provided
therein and no Civil Court shall have jurisdiction
in respect of any matter in which the Appellate
Tribunal has jurisdiction and no injunction shall
be granted by any court or other authority in
respect of any action taken or to be taken in
pursuance of any power conferred under this Act.
The constitutional validity of the Act itself
together with the COFEPOSA had been challenged,
but a nine judges bench of the Supreme Count passed
a historic decision on 12.5.1994 in the case of
Attorney General for Indian etc. Vs. Amritlal
Prajivan Das & others etc, upholding the constitutional
validity of COFEPOSA and SAFEM (FOP) Acts (AIR
1994 SC 2179). It may also be worth noting in
this connection that by virtue of the 38th &
40th Constitution Amendment Acts, both the COFEPOSA&
SAFEMA Acts have been placed in the IXth Schedule
to the Constitution of India. The Supreme Court
also directed the High Courts and other authorities
to dispose of the cases pending before them in
the light of this judgment with all deliberate
speed.
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|